| From: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
| Date: | 2014-09-02 17:06:02 |
| Message-ID: | CAASwCXcQPh=4QqJwFR6WReOnutXFVUbAV2RkZZMvc_Rvbzd4YQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 06:57:42PM +0200, Joel Jacobson wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> > SINGLETON UPDATE ...?
>>
>> Does it come with built-in spell check? :-) It's a bit long to write.
>> I like STRICT, that maps good to what we already have with SELECT ...
>> INTO STRICT.
>
> Spell checker coming in plpgsql3! ;-)
>
> Anyway, as you have seen, the problem is not creating plpgsql2 --- you
> could do that yourself on your own and distribute it. What you want is
> for the community to develop/maintain it, and as you have also seen,
> everyone uses plpgsql slightly differently, so if you want the community
> to maintain it, you are only going to get some of the things you want.
Very true, I totally agree.
But what do you think about,
STRICT UPDATE ...?
> Of course, the idea of upgrading plpgsql is long overdue, so it is very
> good we are all talking about it.
I'm very glad you share that opinion. :-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2014-09-02 17:16:54 | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-09-02 17:01:38 | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |