| From: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
| Date: | 2014-09-02 13:52:36 |
| Message-ID: | CAASwCXc=yBMyD+FtWPV9b8JE8DUabYrEMnci4+eqKptexY5k2w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> On 09/02/2014 04:32 PM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
>> I think it's much better to make it the default behaviour in plpgsql2
>> than to add a new syntax to plpgsql,
>> because then we don't have to argue what to call the keyword or where to
>> put it.
>
>
> Then you'll have to argue what the *other* syntax should look like. And not
> everyone agrees on the default either, see Kevin's email. Designing a new
> language is going to be an uphill battle, even more so than enhancing
> current plpgsql.
Any ideas on what the *other* syntax could look like?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-09-02 13:54:52 | Re: PL/pgSQL 2 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-09-02 13:49:56 | Re: Patch for psql History Display on MacOSX |