From: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: RelationGetNumberOfBlocks called before vacuum_get_cutoffs |
Date: | 2025-06-02 14:27:21 |
Message-ID: | CAAKRu_be9RreRADKO6rn9e3OzuwtdYujzz8N4t_=QH--S9HWow@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 2:23 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>
> I have to imagine that you moved rel_pages initialization back so that
> it took place next to the initialization of other, similar BlockNumber
> fields from LVRelState. IIRC I wrote a comment about this issue at
> least in part because I understood the temptation to do that.
That sounds right.
> > I'll push the fix tomorrow.
>
> Cool.
Attached what I plan to push shortly.
- Melanie
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
Correct-heap-vacuum-boundary-state-setup-ordering.patch | text/x-patch | 2.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2025-06-02 14:30:40 | Re: RelationGetNumberOfBlocks called before vacuum_get_cutoffs |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-06-02 14:21:39 | Re: fix notes about password encryption in pg_authid docs |