Re: trivial designated initializers

From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: trivial designated initializers
Date: 2026-01-28 15:27:45
Message-ID: CAAKRu_bMLz3PLcQFGnm6rcL9pg4g45OnUHMkgM2=k-_yF7i0ew@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 7:21 AM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
>
> We use C99 designated struct initializers in many places, but for some
> reason we don't do it in the tupleLockExtraInfo array in heapam.c nor in
> InternalBGWorkers array in bgworker.c. I've had this trivial patch
> rotting in a worktree for a long time. Any opposition to this change?

I find these much easier to understand with the designated
initializers (and I am a big fan of designated initializers in
general). So +1

- Melanie

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2026-01-28 15:41:52 Re: AIX support
Previous Message Robert Haas 2026-01-28 15:25:58 Re: AIX support