| From: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stepan Neretin <sndcppg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Multi delete wal IDEA |
| Date: | 2024-10-31 18:58:41 |
| Message-ID: | CAAKRu_aHZgw+nisR-qcSfwc+eZyMFnbH9aouoiPc9bm9wk7cUA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 11:42 AM Stepan Neretin <sndcppg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi there, hackers! How about trying out an idea to add an analog to save memory in WAL files for deleting records, similar to multi-insert optimization? This patch is trying to do just that.
Hi,
Thanks for the patch! Could you explain a bit more how this patch
works? I don't see changes in your patch to heap_delete() where WAL is
emitted, so I'm not sure I understand how it works. And could you
provide a small example or repro? It makes it much easier to review
and understand.
- Melanie
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stepan Neretin | 2024-10-31 19:01:52 | Re: Using read stream in autoprewarm |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2024-10-31 18:53:34 | Re: Fix for consume_xids advancing XIDs incorrectly |