From: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Vacuum ERRORs out considering freezing dead tuples from before OldestXmin |
Date: | 2025-06-16 14:58:21 |
Message-ID: | CAAKRu_ZJBkidusDut6i=bDCiXzJEp93GC1+NFaZt4eqanYF3Kw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 10:12 AM John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> (Swapping this part back in my brain as well...) I actually don't
> think we need that where clause anymore since mwm can be super low
> now, and it's a bit mysterious what it was trying to accomplish. Maybe
> we can just use the lowest fill factor to reduce WAL -- having a few
> dozen pages should push it over the memory limit, regardless of how
> many dead tuples are on each pages.
Test in attached patch seems to do the job on 32 bit and 64 bit when tested.
- Melanie
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v1-Test-that-vacuum-removes-tuples-older-than-OldestXmi.patch | text/x-patch | 12.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yugo Nagata | 2025-06-16 15:08:32 | Re: psql: tab-completion support for COPY ... TO/FROM STDIN, STDOUT, and PROGRAM |
Previous Message | Yugo Nagata | 2025-06-16 14:57:10 | Re: Per-role disabling of LEAKPROOF requirements for row-level security? |