Re: Multiple primary key on partition table?

From: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Multiple primary key on partition table?
Date: 2018-09-17 15:36:01
Message-ID: CAAJ_b976GNQFmjquiE7WUwTrPaeQO9aTn2UtZYDD0+y0zr7UDg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Nice catch Rajkumar.

In index_check_primary_key(), relationHasPrimaryKey() called only for the an
alter command but I think we need to call in this case as well, like this:

diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/index.c b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
index 7eb3e35166..c8714395fe 100644
--- a/src/backend/catalog/index.c
+++ b/src/backend/catalog/index.c
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ index_check_primary_key(Relation heapRel,
* and CREATE INDEX doesn't have a way to say PRIMARY KEY, so it's no
* problem either.
*/
- if (is_alter_table &&
+ if ((is_alter_table || heapRel->rd_rel->relispartition) &&
relationHasPrimaryKey(heapRel))
{
ereport(ERROR,

Thoughts?

Regards,
Amul
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 4:51 PM Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
<rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am able to create multiple primary key on partition table by executing below statement.
>
> [edb(at)localhost bin]$ ./psql postgres
> psql (11beta3)
> Type "help" for help.
>
> postgres=# CREATE TABLE t1 (a int PRIMARY KEY,b int) PARTITION BY RANGE (a);
> CREATE TABLE
> postgres=# CREATE TABLE t1_p1 PARTITION OF t1 (b PRIMARY KEY) FOR VALUES FROM (MINVALUE) TO (MAXVALUE);
> CREATE TABLE
> postgres=# \d+ t1_p1
> Table "public.t1_p1"
> Column | Type | Collation | Nullable | Default | Storage | Stats target | Description
> --------+---------+-----------+----------+---------+---------+--------------+-------------
> a | integer | | not null | | plain | |
> b | integer | | not null | | plain | |
> Partition of: t1 FOR VALUES FROM (MINVALUE) TO (MAXVALUE)
> Partition constraint: (a IS NOT NULL)
> Indexes:
> "t1_p1_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (a)
> "t1_p1_pkey1" PRIMARY KEY, btree (b)
>
> Is this fine to allow it?
> eventually it cause to pg_upgrade failed with below error.
>
> pg_restore: creating TABLE "public.t1"
> pg_restore: creating TABLE "public.t1_p1"
> pg_restore: INFO: partition constraint for table "t1_p1" is implied by existing constraints
> pg_restore: creating CONSTRAINT "public.t1 t1_pkey"
> pg_restore: creating CONSTRAINT "public.t1_p1 t1_p1_pkey"
> pg_restore: creating CONSTRAINT "public.t1_p1 t1_p1_pkey1"
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error while PROCESSING TOC:
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] Error from TOC entry 2920; 2606 16395 CONSTRAINT t1_p1 t1_p1_pkey1 edb
> pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR: multiple primary keys for table "t1_p1" are not allowed
> Command was:
> -- For binary upgrade, must preserve pg_class oids
> SELECT pg_catalog.binary_upgrade_set_next_index_pg_class_oid('16394'::pg_catalog.oid);
>
> ALTER TABLE ONLY "public"."t1_p1"
> ADD CONSTRAINT "t1_p1_pkey1" PRIMARY KEY ("b");
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Rajkumar Raghuwanshi
> QMG, EnterpriseDB Corporation

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2018-09-17 15:39:20 Re: Code of Conduct plan
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2018-09-17 15:27:48 Re: Code of Conduct plan