Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join

From: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join
Date: 2019-12-10 06:49:08
Message-ID: CAAJ_b968H3D3gwtH7gv_=ssrFcstoTOacYrg4zVCkjLifjc+9Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 3:08 PM amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Attached is the rebase version atop the latest master head(2d0fdfaccec).
>
>
Hi Fujita san,

I have been through your changes proposed in [1] -- the changes make sense
to me &
I didn't see any unobvious behaviour in testing as well.

Regards,
Amul

1]
https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK15kXh76EnRn=B64u=+qLxZOKWROd4uMjMBnWcsZPdQ_mw@mail.gmail.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2019-12-10 06:53:56 Re: Windows buildfarm members vs. new async-notify isolation test
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2019-12-10 06:39:23 Re: [proposal] recovery_target "latest"