Re: [POC] hash partitioning

From: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [POC] hash partitioning
Date: 2017-10-07 11:52:42
Message-ID: CAAJ_b966RaLm0Bh6uMka5CDFirp++257iGm=P-enuxc6BRkkyg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Jesper Pedersen
<jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Amul,
>
> Could you rebase on latest master ?
>

Sure will post that soon, but before that, I need to test hash partitioning
with recent partition-wise join commit (f49842d1ee), thanks.

Regards,
Amul

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-10-07 13:19:14 Re: separate serial_schedule useful?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2017-10-07 11:26:59 Predicate Locks for writes?