Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows

From: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows
Date: 2016-11-07 05:43:15
Message-ID: CAAJ_b95_RokvJ0vSYq2DTNTm27n6s_vfzVpHNL+WzKOtV7GRXw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The third paragraph may be redundant, I'm a bit inclined to leave it for kindness and completeness. The attached revised patch just correct the existing typo (large -> larger).
>

I am not agree to having this paragraph either, I'll leave the
decision to committer.

> I'll change the status to needs review.

The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

Regards,
Amul Sul

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message amul sul 2016-11-07 06:06:24 Re: Exclude pg_largeobject form pg_dump
Previous Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2016-11-07 05:16:03 Re: Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows