Re: Foreign key validation failure in 18beta1

From: Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: Foreign key validation failure in 18beta1
Date: 2025-06-06 04:25:44
Message-ID: CAAJ_b958t_ZvgSxCaDEAq9in3rYoRzdyx+GLv-KoHF6G6sjcAA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 10:31 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 2025-Jun-04, jian he wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 12:14 PM Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > v7 is way more intuitive compared with v5, v6.
>
> Agreed, this version is better than the previous ones. I split it as
> two commits, for NOT VALID and NOT ENFORCED separately, and modified some
> comments a bit as well as the commit messages.
>

Yeah, it makes sense to have this as a separate commit. Thank you!

Regards,
Amul

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2025-06-06 04:52:52 Re: Slot's restart_lsn may point to removed WAL segment after hard restart unexpectedly
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2025-06-06 03:41:02 Re: [PATCH] Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX