Re: [POC] hash partitioning

From: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [POC] hash partitioning
Date: 2017-09-15 06:30:09
Message-ID: CAAJ_b953P4nO63oOs3nVJBiTMD9gOVsGCBc89HUcw=npN=Ka2A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:30 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:

> On 14 September 2017 at 09:58, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Jesper Pedersen
> > <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Amul,
> >>
> >> On 09/08/2017 08:40 AM, amul sul wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Rebased 0002 against this commit & renamed to 0001, PFA.
> >>>
> >>
> >> This patch needs a rebase.
> >>
> >
> > Thanks for your note.
> > Attached is the patch rebased on the latest master head.
> > Also added error on
> > creating
> > d
> > efault partition
> > for the hash partitioned table
> > ,
> > and updated document &
> > test script for the same.
>
> Sorry, but this needs another rebase as it's broken by commit
> 77b6b5e9ceca04dbd6f0f6cd3fc881519acc8714.
>
> ​
Attached rebased patch, thanks.

Regards,
Amul

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-hash-partitioning_another_design-v20.patch application/octet-stream 86.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Douglas Doole 2017-09-15 06:33:01 Re: Add Roman numeral conversion to to_number
Previous Message Haribabu Kommi 2017-09-15 06:22:48 Re: utility commands benefiting from parallel plan