Re: [POC] hash partitioning

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [POC] hash partitioning
Date: 2017-09-14 23:00:04
Message-ID: CAA-aLv4cL-HGBR7DD4KsGMPiC=0gtFxUsD=PpO1z+ckSKGuXzQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 14 September 2017 at 09:58, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 7:43 PM, Jesper Pedersen
> <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Amul,
>>
>> On 09/08/2017 08:40 AM, amul sul wrote:
>>>
>>> Rebased 0002 against this commit & renamed to 0001, PFA.
>>>
>>
>> This patch needs a rebase.
>>
>
> Thanks for your note.
> Attached is the patch rebased on the latest master head.
> Also added error on
> creating
> d
> efault partition
> for the hash partitioned table
> ,
> and updated document &
> test script for the same.

Sorry, but this needs another rebase as it's broken by commit
77b6b5e9ceca04dbd6f0f6cd3fc881519acc8714.

Thom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2017-09-14 23:23:45 Re: Clarification in pg10's pgupgrade.html step 10 (upgrading standby servers)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-09-14 22:11:25 Re: [JDBC] Channel binding support for SCRAM-SHA-256