Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE of partition key

From: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Restrict concurrent update/delete with UPDATE of partition key
Date: 2018-04-06 08:49:02
Message-ID: CAAJ_b94X5Y_zdTN=BGdZie+hM4p6qW70-XCJhFYaCUO0OfF=aQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:19 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 12:50 PM, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Updated patch attached.
>>
>
> + if (ItemPointerIndicatesMovedPartitions(&hufd.ctid))
> + ereport(ERROR,
> + (errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
> + errmsg("tuple to be locked was already moved to another partition
> due to concurrent update")));
>
> As suggested by Andres, I think you should change the error code to
> serialization failure i.e ERRCODE_T_R_SERIALIZATION_FAILURE.
>

Thanks for the reminder -- fixed in the attached version.

Regards,
Amul

Attachment Content-Type Size
v10-0001-Raise-error-when-affecting-tuple-moved-int.patch application/octet-stream 41.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2018-04-06 08:51:46 Re: Get the name of the target Relation from Query struct?
Previous Message Ernst-Georg Schmid 2018-04-06 08:38:46 AW: Get the name of the target Relation from Query struct?