Re: [POC] hash partitioning

From: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [POC] hash partitioning
Date: 2017-11-10 05:38:05
Message-ID: CAAJ_b94HZsTEmL9ys8zeNrszQtFT4eCBNyJS3yBTjxhPfFZE0A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 4:41 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:16 AM, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Fixed in the 0003 patch.
>
> I have committed this patch set with the attached adjustments.
>

Thanks a lot for your support & a ton of thanks to all reviewer.

Regards,
Amul

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2017-11-10 05:38:11 Re: path toward faster partition pruning
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-11-10 04:18:48 Re: [POC] Faster processing at Gather node