Re: Optimizing select count query which often takes over 10 seconds

From: Alexander Farber <alexander(dot)farber(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Optimizing select count query which often takes over 10 seconds
Date: 2013-01-27 17:25:02
Message-ID: CAADeyWitdfbor4sF7wgRzc_VjQGvtGBrwx_PP09i9-o4tLocPw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hello -

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Alexander Farber
> <alexander(dot)farber(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> LOG: duration: 12590.394 ms statement:
>> select count(id) from (
>> select id,
>> row_number() over(partition by yw order by money
>> desc) as ranking
>> from pref_money
>> ) x
>> where x.ranking = 1 and id='OK471018960997'
>
> This sounds like a good idea. But if the tournament is weekly why
> would the job have to be hourly? Why do the results of a weekly
> tournament need to be 'live'?

because for the current week
the medals are displayed too.

And when a player enters a top
then he should get +1 medals and
the one he pushed from the top -1 medals

So even hourly isn't really good enough for me...
It should be "live" stats.

Regards
Alex

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2013-01-27 18:41:40 Re: Finding common hstore key=>value pairs with hstore
Previous Message Jon Smark 2013-01-27 16:18:17 Best approach for query with optional constraints