| From: | Zheng Li <zhengli10(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, japin <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, rajesh(dot)rs0541(at)gmail(dot)com, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
| Date: | 2022-04-11 17:36:42 |
| Message-ID: | CAAD30UKtDOmjMOyXG6bhpKj9eswQ31scPR50Ne37AfUfEhKb8A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
> I'm planning to work on the initial DDL replication. I'll open a new thread as
> soon as I write a design for it. Just as an example, the pglogical approach is
> to use pg_dump behind the scenes to provide the schema [1]. It is a reasonable
> approach but an optimal solution should be an API to provide the initial DDL
> commands. I mean the main point of this feature is to have an API to create an
> object that the logical replication can use it for initial schema
> synchronization. This "DDL to create an object" was already discussed in the
> past [2].
Nice! I think automatic initial schema synchronization for replication
is a very useful feature.
Regards,
Zheng
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rob Sargent | 2022-04-11 23:10:27 | How easy is it to lose permissions in 'public' schema? |
| Previous Message | Zheng Li | 2022-04-11 17:31:17 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2022-04-11 17:59:08 | Re: typos |
| Previous Message | Euler Taveira | 2022-04-11 17:32:53 | Re: PG DOCS - logical replication filtering |