From: | Alessandro Gagliardi <alessandro(at)path(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "ktm(at)rice(dot)edu" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Planning a Large RDBMS |
Date: | 2012-06-15 19:55:49 |
Message-ID: | CAAB3BBLqtHPc5Bzz=knN=x=4YhNVHEuquoZRiLxXf1Lg27Jcfw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
I couldn't find anything on pgpool regarding sharding, but I did stumble
upon this presentation<http://www.pgcon.org/2012/schedule/attachments/232_fotolog.pdf>
that
mentioned pl/proxy. PL/Proxy looks good for sharding, though it looks like
it could really limit the ability to do ad hoc queries. But I suppose that
would work for OLTP and then we could just maintain a separate OLAP
database that may have to read from disk but would have the advantage of
existing on a single machine....
-Alessandro
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:17 PM, ktm(at)rice(dot)edu <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:58:02AM -0700, Alessandro Gagliardi wrote:
> > I pretty much consider anything v1.0 to be "beta" for all intents and
> purposes.
> >
> > That said, perhaps the intersection between "web scale" and "tried and
> > true" is a null set. I hope it's not. I guess what I'm hoping for is a
> > methodology that uses tried and true technology (as opposed to untested
> > bleeding edge technology).
> >
>
> You may want to look at pgpool to shard across a set of databases.
> Good luck and keep us updated with what you do and how it worked out.
>
> Regards,
> Ken
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Henry Ramsey | 2012-06-15 23:08:41 | Query Question |
Previous Message | Alessandro Gagliardi | 2012-06-15 18:44:51 | Re: Planning a Large RDBMS |