Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences

From: Henson Choi <assam258(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeroen Vermeulen <jtvjtv(at)gmail(dot)com>, VASUKI M <vasukianand0119(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #19354: JOHAB rejects valid byte sequences
Date: 2026-05-16 09:39:13
Message-ID: CAAAe_zDuTVCQuLnZv827yR2uAx+fgSixeWa+gvEgtSgQe_M28A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

2026년 5월 15일 (금) 오전 4:36, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>님이 작성:

> On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 2:59 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:>
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 5:58 PM Henson Choi <assam258(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > While reading through the encoding alias table in
> src/common/encnames.c,
> > > I noticed a few long-standing inaccuracies and omissions in the
> per-entry
> > > comments for the three Korean encodings.
> >
> > LGTM, so I will go ahead and push this to all branches.
>
> I see that this was done, but this isn't the actual fix for this
> issue, right? Is somebody going to apply the main fix patch (perhaps
> just to master)?

Right -- the cosmetic encnames.c comment cleanup is what Thomas
pushed; the actual verifier fix is still pending. Tatsuo gave a +1
for preserving JOHAB and applying the verifier correction.

Thomas may have other priorities right now. This is not urgent on my
end, so I am content to wait for him.

Thanks,
Henson

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Bug reporting form 2026-05-16 10:07:20 BUG #19481: multivariate MCV expression stats not applied for equivalent predicates on nullable side of LEFT JOI
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2026-05-16 04:28:56 Re: BUG #19478: `dblink_close` can be used for injection.