| From: | Henson Choi <assam258(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Arne Roland <arne(dot)roland(at)malkut(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Anders Granlund <anders(dot)granlund(dot)0(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)chouppes(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Key joins |
| Date: | 2026-06-25 14:09:01 |
| Message-ID: | CAAAe_zD0e5pK3YQPYx+YEhvDnZknZNTJ6F4rtOygALWVHf3XDg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Arne,
Thank you for the thorough and thoughtful response. As you suggested:
> "You can read more about our design rationale in chapter 8 in the
> attached key_joins.pdf or online at https://keyjoin.org/#sec8. For an
> understanding of the usefulness of the feature I suggest sections 7.2
> to 7.6 again in the key_joins.pdf or online at https://keyjoin.org/#sec7.2
."
I will read through these sections carefully and come back with further
comments.
I genuinely admire the ambition of bringing this to WG3. Pushing a
Change Proposal to the SQL standard is no small undertaking, and I
respect the effort behind it. I hope the Stockholm meeting goes well.
On a personal note — I work on PostgreSQL upstream contributions myself,
and I have long been interested in the SQL standard as a living
document rather than a fixed reference. If I ever reach the point of
wanting to raise a small question or propose a correction based on
something I encounter in implementation work, would it be alright to
reach out to you?
Best regards,
Henson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Henson Choi | 2026-06-25 14:15:09 | Re: IGNORE/RESPECT NULLS can be specified for (prokind == 'f'). |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2026-06-25 14:04:30 | Re: hashjoins vs. Bloom filters (yet again) |