Hi Prashant,
Thank you for the review and the testing.
> One small coverage note: the new test covers the pretty, named-AS
> form. The DEFAULT form and the non-pretty output are exercised by my
> testing above but are not in the patch's tests; a DEFAULT line in the
> new test would be a nice addition, but I do not consider it a blocker.
Good point. I will extend the test and post a v2.
Best regards,
Henson