| From: | Henson Choi <assam258(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com, sjjang112233(at)gmail(dot)com, vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org, er(at)xs4all(dot)nl, jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com, peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org, li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Row pattern recognition |
| Date: | 2026-06-26 01:37:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAAAe_zCBN3QZP6g3P5Yv5sOdJgUZE6iLs=5HxOyyOn7wkKXrMA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi all,
One small follow-up on top of v50.
Master recently reworded the error raised when RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS is used
on a non-window function, from
"only window functions accept RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS"
to
"RESPECT/IGNORE NULLS specified, but %s is not a window function".
rpr_base was written before that change, so one expected-output line now
mismatches and the test fails on current master. The attached patch updates
just that line. No code or behavior change.
I'm sending it as a separate attachment so the v50 series stays as posted;
it applies on top of v50-0020.
Best,
Henson
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| nocfbot-ignore-nulls-errmsg.txt | text/plain | 1.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2026-06-26 01:39:00 | Re: Handle concurrent drop when doing whole database vacuum |
| Previous Message | Henson Choi | 2026-06-26 01:23:53 | Re: Row pattern recognition |