| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Mark Wong <mark(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: ppc64le support in 9.3 branch? |
| Date: | 2018-03-27 00:18:17 |
| Message-ID: | CAA8=A78RMC2SmabZMDb-A7rC3zAwLRr=W+cvPgZbiksZTmSguA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 08:01:53PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>>> I'm inclined to just ask them to stop running the animals on that
>>> branch. There are no pre-existing users on 9.3 ppc64le, and new
>>> customers hopefully won't move to 9.3. ISTM backpatching is riskier than
>>> just changing a bunch of buildfarm configurations.
>>
>> +1 for dropping it.
>
> +1. If something like that were to happen for 10 or 9.6 knowing that
> they still have four years to go, that could be debated, but just for 6
> months there is little benefit.
I am in discussions with Mark, he's going to disable the animals from
building 9.3. (by setting branches_to_build to 'HEAD_PLUS_LATEST4'
instead of 'ALL').
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-03-27 00:20:01 | Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg |
| Previous Message | David Rowley | 2018-03-27 00:14:15 | Re: Parallel Aggregates for string_agg and array_agg |