From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Allow 'sslkey' and 'sslcert' in postgres_fdw user mappings |
Date: | 2020-01-09 08:14:33 |
Message-ID: | CAA8=A7--sxQg-CRsZQsfs=CdFoOgGvCWD5B5Ay8ojMdp9ZRtxg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 7:36 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2019-12-02 00:12, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > On 11/30/19 8:48 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 07:54:41PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >>> This patch achieves $SUBJECT and also provides some testing of the
> >>> sslpassword setting.
> >> The patch does not apply anymore, so a rebase is needed. As it has
> >> not been reviewed, I am moving it to next CF, waiting on author.
> >
> > That's OK. This patch is dependent, as it always has been, on the patch
> > to allow passwordless user mappings for postgres_fdw. I hope to commit
> > that soon, but I'd prefer some signoff from prominent hackers, as I
> > don't want to go too far down this road and then encounter a bunch of
> > objections.
>
> The prerequisite patch has been committed, so please see about getting
> this patch moving forward.
>
> The patch is very small, of course, but I don't understand the "bit of a
> hack" comment. Could you explain that?
>
I have rewritten the comment, and committed the feature.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Deng, Gang | 2020-01-09 08:53:42 | [PATCH] Resolve Parallel Hash Join Performance Issue |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2020-01-09 08:11:33 | pgsql: Allow 'sslkey' and 'sslcert' in postgres_fdw user mappings |