Re: Possible regression in PG18 beta1

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sadeq Dousti <msdousti(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Christophe Courtois <christophe(dot)courtois(at)dalibo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Possible regression in PG18 beta1
Date: 2025-05-18 14:52:20
Message-ID: CAA5RZ0vmVQA-yPATOB50YZmOJ6jjRs7dsugy2zxQ+WtdG2yRhA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I'm now thinking maybe the compilation options for PG 17.5 have been
> different. I'm using the default version that comes with Homebrew, but for
> PG 18, I compiled it myself. Here are the results for `select version();`
> on both:
>
> PostgreSQL 17.5 (Homebrew) on aarch64-apple-darwin24.4.0,
> compiled by Apple clang version 17.0.0 (clang-1700.0.13.3), 64-bit
>

In my tests I build from source from both the 17 stable and head branch
and use the same build options.

Why temp uses checksum, which also happens on 17 and presumably
earlier versions, is still not too clear to me.


Sami

>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mihail Nikalayeu 2025-05-18 15:09:00 Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-05-18 14:46:02 Re: To make pg_dump and pg_restore parallel in processing limited number of LOs