| From: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends |
| Date: | 2025-11-03 17:50:48 |
| Message-ID: | CAA5RZ0va93+wk3_6UYi52=b=xqbKtXvaM-Cj5moTir7nM-LA=Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> I am not sure we need to do anything about this.
>
>
> Or maybe we just avoid the tranche_id from leaking
> in test_dsa_resowners() by making it a static variable
> and checking if we have a valid tranche id before calling
> LWLockNewTrancheId()? That is the proper pattern.
Like the attached.
--
Sami
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v1-0001-Prevent-tranche_id-leak-in-test_dsa_resowners.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2025-11-03 17:57:18 | Re: test_json_parser/002_inline is kind of slow |
| Previous Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2025-11-03 17:44:31 | psql --help=variables missing csv_fieldsep |