Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends
Date: 2025-08-18 18:06:42
Message-ID: CAA5RZ0vPcUb68h16ueg=A1R4ps=qU74jvG8N2xaX97DAK-E7_A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> see v9

Sorry about the quick follow-up I was not happy with one of the
comment updates in
SyncLWLockTrancheNames. I updated it.

Attached is v10,

--

Sami

Attachment Content-Type Size
v10-0001-Implement-a-DSA-for-LWLock-tranche-names.patch application/octet-stream 33.6 KB
v10-0002-Add-tests-for-LWLock-tranche-names-DSA.patch application/octet-stream 18.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-08-18 18:41:43 Re: Small issue with kerberos tests
Previous Message Marthin Laubscher 2025-08-18 17:43:29 Re: About Custom Aggregates, C Extensions and Memory