Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ilia Evdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com>
Cc: "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements
Date: 2025-01-15 17:16:01
Message-ID: CAA5RZ0vCLbYfCuECC-wdsyG4VK=UD8wsqtw3xKK1_jZPFqUrYw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Probably, but first I suggest benchmarking with sampling applied to all queries. If the results are good, we can later filter certain queries based on different characteristics.

Absolutely. The benchmark numbers to justify this feature are
the next step. Thanks for your work on this!

Regards,

Sami

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-01-15 17:19:03 Re: Make pg_stat_io view count IOs as bytes instead of blocks
Previous Message Sami Imseih 2025-01-15 17:09:00 Re: POC: track vacuum/analyze cumulative time per relation