Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeremy Schneider <schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread
Date: 2025-10-30 21:05:09
Message-ID: CAA5RZ0uo-nU9KqgXV5Tcf8aWWQkxsb5BDpkb-2Qfwbw-UVVaUA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 04:05:19PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Are you planning to do some practical experimentation with this? I
> > feel like it would be a good idea to set up some kind of a test case
> > where this is expected to provide a benefit and see if it actually
> > does; and also maybe set up a test case where it will reorder the
> > tables but with no practical difference in the outcome expected and
> > verify that, in fact, nothing changes.
>
> Yes. I've been thinking through how I want to test this but have yet to
> actually do so. If you have ideas, I'm all ears.

FWIW, I've been putting some scripts together to test some workloads
and I will share shortly what I have.

--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2025-10-30 21:34:29 Fully documenting the design of nbtree row comparison scan keys
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2025-10-30 21:02:24 Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread