Quick Links

Re: dshash_find_or_insert vs. OOM

From:	Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:	Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:	PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject:	Re: dshash_find_or_insert vs. OOM
Date:	2026-03-20 00:26:22
Message-ID:	CAA5RZ0uhz2uEtUV1KqoCHKQY4U3pgB6N1n-oR-gy8TPUoenQSA@mail.gmail.com
Views:	Whole Thread \| Raw Message \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

I just realized v2 removed the test for dshash_find_or_insert_extended
with the NO_OOM flag. Corrected in v3.

--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Attachment	Content-Type	Size
v3-0001-Add-test-module-for-dshash.patch	application/octet-stream	13.0 KB

In response to

Re: dshash_find_or_insert vs. OOM at 2026-03-19 19:15:45 from Sami Imseih

Responses

Re: dshash_find_or_insert vs. OOM at 2026-03-25 17:55:02 from Robert Haas

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Xuneng Zhou	2026-03-20 00:52:46	Re: BUG: Cascading standby fails to reconnect after falling back to archive recovery
Previous Message	Masahiko Sawada	2026-03-19 23:58:05	Re: POC: Parallel processing of indexes in autovacuum