| From: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: remove autoanalyze corner case |
| Date: | 2026-04-04 13:34:38 |
| Message-ID: | CAA5RZ0ucRoar8oV9EQu5y5OvT3jLNtsOn8vsRotTYsF1cLa62g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> AFAICS, near misses on wraparound in and of itself have no correlation
>> with statistical changes in your data, so I'd agree it isn't
>> necessary, and the fact that it behaves differently in this more
>> narrow case than it would in the more general case, when these two
>> cases are (as far as I've ever known) supposed to behave the same way,
>> I'd be +1 to remove this.
> Yeah, that matches my impression. +1 to remove it.
That is fine with me also.
The patch LGTM.
--
Sami
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2026-04-04 13:51:09 | Re: Better shared data structure management and resizable shared data structures |
| Previous Message | John Naylor | 2026-04-04 13:25:40 | Re: Proposal for enabling auto-vectorization for checksum calculations |