Re: pg_get_multixact_members not documented

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_get_multixact_members not documented
Date: 2025-07-01 15:29:28
Message-ID: CAA5RZ0u57YUYETH3E5unLohs3CJdzmYrJiWf9kAAZWgnPxKp=w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>> Perhaps we should think about removing this description, what do you think?

> I think it's a good topic for another patch/thread. Chances are it's not
> the only description that could be updated.

Sure, that could be taken up after this patch.

> That's what I mean. I think it should say
>
> However, the functions shown in Table 9.84, except age, mxid_age, and
> pg_get_multixact_members, use a 64-bit type xid8 that...

I agree. v7 includes this change.

--

Sami

Attachment Content-Type Size
v7-0001-Document-pg_get_multixact_members.patch application/octet-stream 4.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-07-01 15:39:46 Re: back-patch documentation for age() and mxid_age()
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-07-01 15:18:41 Re: No error checking when reading from file using zstd in pg_dump