Re: test_autovacuum/001_parallel_autovacuum is broken

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniil Davydov <3danissimo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: test_autovacuum/001_parallel_autovacuum is broken
Date: 2026-04-09 22:54:19
Message-ID: CAA5RZ0tLxDGS7p+H4LD-GbV4e6oQ8iHws_xLE6CvsSN_e8Ay_A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I believe that we don't need to worry about the regexp for this test.
> Parallel vacuum would be used on all tables having more than one
> index, but we enable the autovacuum logs only on the test_autovac
> table.

ah, correct.

```
) WITH (autovacuum_parallel_workers = $autovacuum_parallel_workers,
log_autovacuum_min_duration = 0);
```

see v3 with the reverted regexp string.

Thanks!

--
Sami

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Fix-unstable-log_contains-in-parallel-autovacuum-.patch application/octet-stream 3.2 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2026-04-09 23:03:06 Re: Backpatching make_ctags -e and -n to v15 and v14
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2026-04-09 22:38:38 Re: Allow a condition string in an injection point