| From: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_utility ? |
| Date: | 2025-11-18 18:49:45 |
| Message-ID: | CAA5RZ0sfb=wZ2umD33pTwxbYO+Z=J=iQegfcFkhJCbT59Fh_cg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> pg_utility vacuum -t tab1 -t tab2 # what vacuumdb does
> pg_utility analyze -t tab1 -t tab2 # what vacuumdb -Z does
> pg_utility vacuum analyze -t tab1 -t tab2 # what vacuumdb -z does
> pg_utility cluster -t tab1 -t tab2 # what clusterdb does
> pg_utility reindex -t tab1 -t tab2 # what reindexdb does
Is the idea to get rid of most of bin/scripts and replace them with a single
pg_utility? or will it just be a wrapper for the existing utilities? meaning
they will still work stand-alone.
--
Sami Imseih
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2025-11-18 18:54:11 | Re: nbtree VACUUM's REDO routine doesn't clear page's VACUUM cycle ID |
| Previous Message | Melanie Plageman | 2025-11-18 18:49:28 | Re: Checkpointer write combining |