Re: problem during postgres restore: max_connections = 100 is a lower setting than on the primary server, where its value was 350

From: Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: problem during postgres restore: max_connections = 100 is a lower setting than on the primary server, where its value was 350
Date: 2026-03-02 16:13:22
Message-ID: CAA5-nLBjwDeXTbsMxL-fwbfQ8asoCG0uG6hCMzPt2MLysdwFwQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Thanks for answering Laurenz,

I think the value of max_connections must be aligned with primary because
the goal is to maintain this sizing in case of a failover and promotion of
the standby.
Why to be conservative with `max_connection` and not with shared buffer?
If we're performing recovery on a machine with significantly fewer CPU and
RAM resources than the original server, lowering these parameters could be
an option because they reserve memory at starting.

These are the questions I've been asking to myself.

On Mon, Mar 2, 2026 at 4:20 PM Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> Thanks for answering Laurenz,
>
> I think the value of max_connections must be aligned with primary because
> the goal is to maintain this sizing in case of a failover and promotion of
> the standby.
> Why to be conservative with `max_connection` and not with shared buffer?
> If we're performing recovery on a machine with significantly fewer CPU and
> RAM resources than the original server, lowering these parameters could be
> an option because they reserve memory at starting.
>
> These are the questions I've been asking to myself.
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2026 at 3:36 PM Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2026-03-02 at 11:27 +0100, Fabrice Chapuis wrote:
>> > I got this error from restoring a backup on a recovery machine.
>> > I got error about the max_connections that I changed from 350 to 100.
>> > in the control file the value is 350
>> > /usr/pgsql-17/bin/pg_controldata -D /pgdata/pgsql/17/main/ | grep
>> max_conn
>> > max_connections setting: 350
>> > That is the value registered from the primary. But the primary is not
>> intended to be connected during this restore.
>> > primary_conninfo is desactivated.
>> >
>> > Is there a trick to change decrease this value and start the instance.
>>
>> Why bother?
>>
>> Leave max_connections at 350.
>>
>> Yours,
>> Laurenz Albe
>>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Laurenz Albe 2026-03-02 17:42:52 Re: problem during postgres restore: max_connections = 100 is a lower setting than on the primary server, where its value was 350
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2026-03-02 14:36:30 Re: problem during postgres restore: max_connections = 100 is a lower setting than on the primary server, where its value was 350