Re: Postgres Parameters

From: Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sam Stearns <sam(dot)stearns(at)dat(dot)com>
Cc: Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres Parameters
Date: 2025-11-11 11:19:45
Message-ID: CAA5-nLBPuxwQdZ0mFNMTP9kyQ+b9qY9PYKKWf=Q+SRxJS1iiKg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Hi,

You could also use this query, if the ratio is low, that means there is no
pressure on wal size and you can keep the max_wal_size value as it is.

SELECT
num_timed,
num_requested,
round((num_requested::numeric / NULLIF(num_timed + num_requested, 0)) *
100, 2)
AS requested_pct
FROM pg_stat_checkpointer;
+-----------+---------------+---------------+
| num_timed | num_requested | requested_pct |
+-----------+---------------+---------------+
| 3502 | 146 | 4.00 |
+-----------+---------------+---------------+
(1 row)

Regards,

Fabrice

On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 12:28 AM Sam Stearns <sam(dot)stearns(at)dat(dot)com> wrote:

> Howdy,
>
> Could someone advise on how to determine the correct settings for the
> following, please?:
>
>
> - checkpoint_timeout
> - max_wal_size
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Sam
>
> --
>
> Samuel Stearns
> Team Lead - Database
> c: 971 762 6879 | o: 971 762 6879 | DAT.com
>
> <https://www.dat.com/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=DAT_email_signature_link>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sam Stearns 2025-11-11 15:24:49 Re: Postgres Parameters
Previous Message Laurenz Albe 2025-11-11 08:57:13 Re: Postgres Parameters