Re: Issue with logical replication slot during switchover

From: Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Issue with logical replication slot during switchover
Date: 2025-08-29 13:58:07
Message-ID: CAA5-nLAF0Q+c9BVDLEh1MK5afnpypWVzxiQRkzH83=9=cYkcCw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks Shveta for your procedure to follow, here is the version 1 of the
patch

Regards,

Fabrice

On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 5:34 AM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 9:11 PM Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > What is the procedure to create this patch. Thank you for your help.
> >
>
> We use 'git format-patch' to generate formatted patches. I have given
> a few links ([1],[2],[3)] on know-how.
>
> I usually use these steps:
>
>
> git add <file1.c> <adds file to staging area>
> git add <file2.c>
> <once all the required files are added, create a commit>
> git commit <add the required message to describe the patch>
> git format-patch -1 -v1 <create the patch>
> -1-> to create patch for last 1 commit
> -v1 --> patch-prefix. I have used v1 which indicates version-1, when
> we upload the patch a second time, we can use -v2 and so on.
>
> [1]:
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6658313/how-can-i-generate-a-git-patch-for-a-specific-commit
> [2]:
> https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/git/how-to-generate-a-git-patch-for-a-specific-commit/
> [3]:
> https://gist.github.com/ganapathichidambaram/3504e31fc8ba809762b3a0d9d9ef8ec2
>
> thanks
> Shveta
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-fix-failover-slot-issue-when-doing-a-switchover.patch application/octet-stream 9.6 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2025-08-29 14:07:39 Re: Assert single row returning SQL-standard functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-08-29 13:57:33 Re: allow benign typedef redefinitions (C11)