Re: Add pgstathashindex() to get hash index table statistics.

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add pgstathashindex() to get hash index table statistics.
Date: 2017-02-07 03:40:33
Message-ID: CAA4eK1Lvj_YJhufjJVx3BE3SbS5r1HTLMV32LOL-Grjkjdd1Jw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 11:36 PM, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Committed with those changes.
>>
>> Thanks for above corrections and commit. But, There are couple of
>> things that we might have to change once the patch for 'WAL in Hash
>> Indexes' gets checked-in.
>>
>> 1) The test-case result needs to be changed because there won't be any
>> WARNING message : "WARNING: hash indexes are not WAL-logged and their
>> use is discouraged".
>>
>> 2) From WAL patch for Hash Indexes onwards, we won't have any zero
>> pages in Hash Indexes so I don't think we need to have column showing
>> zero pages (zero_pages). When working on WAL in hash indexes, we found
>> that WAL routine 'XLogReadBufferExtended' does not expect a page to be
>> completely zero page else it returns Invalid Buffer. To fix this, we
>> started initializing freed overflow page and newly allocated bucket
>> pages using _hash_pageinit() hence I don't think there will be any
>> zero pages from here onwards.
>
> Maybe we should call them "unused pages".
>

+1. If we consider some more names for that column then probably one
alternative could be "empty pages".

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Soref 2017-02-07 03:52:37 Re: Possible spelling fixes
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-02-07 03:17:59 Re: Index corruption with CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY