Re: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hou, Zhijie" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)cn(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Tang, Haiying" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)cn(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)
Date: 2021-03-08 13:18:37
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LvX9wa_Tvx6ty=Y8ZOVg283-eoiG5UCvfpoKtihe+Gjw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 3:54 PM Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I've attached an updated set of patches with the suggested locking changes.
>

Amit L, others, do let me know if you have still more comments on
0001* patch or if you want to review it further?

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-03-08 13:26:03 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Dilip Kumar 2021-03-08 13:07:38 Re: New Table Access Methods for Multi and Single Inserts