Re: repeated decoding of prepared transactions

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: repeated decoding of prepared transactions
Date: 2021-02-25 11:36:00
Message-ID: CAA4eK1Lv+sgr1V6u8E+Vs_+20urB2cE34fHgfNKwUaGsd8nuYA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 5:06 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 4:48 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > I plan to split this into two patches next. But do review and let me
> > know if you have any comments.
>
> Attaching an updated patch-set with the changes for
> snapshot_was_exported_at_lsn separated out from the changes for the
> APIs pg_create_logical_replication_slot() and
> pg_logical_slot_get_changes(). Along with a rebase that takes in a few
> more commits since my last patch.
>

Few comments on the first patch:
1. We can't remove ReorderBufferSkipPrepare because we rely on that in
SnapBuildDistributeNewCatalogSnapshot.
2. I have changed the name of the variable from
snapshot_was_exported_at_lsn to snapshot_was_exported_at but I am
still not very sure about this naming because there are times when we
don't export snapshot and we still set this like when creating slots
with CRS_NOEXPORT_SNAPSHOT or when creating via SQL APIs. The other
name that comes to mind is initial_consistency_at, what do you think?
3. Changed comments at various places.

Please find the above changes as a separate patch, if you like you can
include these in the main patch.

Apart from the above, I think the comments related to docs in my
previous email [1] are still valid, can you please take care of those.

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1Kr34_TiREr57Wpd%3D3%3D03x%3D1n55DAjwJPGpHAEc4dWfUQ%40mail.gmail.com

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-Avoid-repeated-decoding-of-prepared-transactions.patch application/octet-stream 16.0 KB
v3-0002-Fixed-review-comments.patch application/octet-stream 9.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-02-25 13:31:33 Re: [PATCH] Note effect of max_replication_slots on subscriber side in documentation.
Previous Message vignesh C 2021-02-25 11:34:01 Re: repeated decoding of prepared transactions