Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
Date: 2024-03-27 08:55:42
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LrO2qGcQot-9EgxpQRiT1O5+enHb57oN7OSNKSTn2hNQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 11:57 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The attached patch has changes to wait for regress_sub4 subscription
> to apply the changes from the publisher before verifying the data.
>

Pushed after changing the order of wait as it looks logical to wait
for regress_sub5 after enabling the subscription. Thanks

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vallimaharajan G 2024-03-27 09:07:43 Query Regarding frame options initialization in Window aggregate state
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-03-27 08:43:37 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum