From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Vitaly Davydov <v(dot)davydov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, tomas(at)vondra(dot)me |
Subject: | Re: Slot's restart_lsn may point to removed WAL segment after hard restart unexpectedly |
Date: | 2025-06-06 05:19:13 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LqeHVnem1iF+4Jy2M36ZyN57szJdPv3TjnQr+ksZ_Qqw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 6:51 PM Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> >
> > As per my understanding, for logical slots, effective_xmin is only set
> > during the initial copy phase (or say if one has to export a
> > snapshot), after that, its value won't change. Please read the
> > comments in CreateInitDecodingContext() where we set its value. If you
> > still have questions about it, we can discuss further.
>
> OK, thank you for the clarification. I've read the comments in
> CreateInitDecodingContext() as you suggested. All of above makes me
> think *_xmin fields are handled properly.
>
Yes, they handled properly for logical slots, but there is no similar
safety mechanism for physical slots.
One minor comment:
+
+ /* Latest restart_lsn that has been flushed to disk. For persistent slots
+ * the flushed LSN should be taken into account when calculating the oldest
This doesn't follow our practice for multi-line comments.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-06-06 05:30:33 | Re: Update Windows CI Task Names: Server 2022 + VS 2022 Upgrade |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2025-06-06 05:15:34 | Re: Remaining dependency on setlocale() |