Re: pg_stat_statements issue with parallel maintenance (Was Re: WAL usage calculation patch)

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements issue with parallel maintenance (Was Re: WAL usage calculation patch)
Date: 2020-04-08 07:04:09
Message-ID: CAA4eK1Lp98DQ6WMcRL4bhdFedOxYts34+2LgH9qSXE6AVk8U8A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 11:53 AM Masahiko Sawada
<masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 14:44, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the investigation. I don't see we can do anything special
> > about this. In an ideal world, this should be done once and not for
> > each worker but I guess it doesn't matter too much. I am not sure if
> > it is worth adding a comment for this, what do you think?
> >
>
> I agree with you. If the differences were considerably large probably
> we would do something but I think we don't need to anything at this
> time.
>

Fair enough, can you once check this in back-branches as this needs to
be backpatched? I will do that once by myself as well.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Asif Rehman 2020-04-08 07:09:20 Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup
Previous Message davinder singh 2020-04-08 07:02:51 Re: PG compilation error with Visual Studio 2015/2017/2019