Re: Transaction commits VS Transaction commits (with parallel) VS query mean time

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Transaction commits VS Transaction commits (with parallel) VS query mean time
Date: 2019-04-10 05:32:02
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LoLSjmjZJVEm1hc+RmG5PyFbcpezaXSnA95VycrQFb_w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:51 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 7:54 AM Jamison, Kirk <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> > So I am marking this thread as “Ready for Committer”.
> >
>
> Thanks, Hari and Jamison for verification. The patches for
> back-branches looks good to me. I will once again verify them before
> commit. I will commit this patch tomorrow unless someone has
> objections. Robert/Alvaro, do let me know if you see any problem with
> this fix?
>

Pushed.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2019-04-10 05:55:48 Re: Problem with default partition pruning
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-04-10 05:19:59 Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum