Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side

On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:47 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 12:00 PM Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
>
> > Another comment on the 0001 patch: as there is now a mix of setting
> > "apply_error_callback_arg" members directly and also through inline
> > functions, it might look better to have it done consistently with
> > functions having prototypes something like the following:
> >
> > static inline void set_apply_error_context_rel(LogicalRepRelMapEntry *rel);
> > static inline void reset_apply_error_context_rel(void);
> > static inline void set_apply_error_context_attnum(int remote_attnum);
>
> It might look consistent, but if we do that, we will end up needing
> functions every field to update when we add new fields to the struct
> in the future?
>

Yeah, I also think it is too much, but we can add comments where ever
we set the information for error callback. I see it is missing when
the patch is setting remote_attnum, see similar other places and add
comments if already not there.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.