Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Markus Wanner <markus(dot)wanner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep
Date: 2021-02-23 06:30:38
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LiRANS55XHKUcY9wX7td02xw7iq7Y9e58Rj=QZtV9Zqg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 9:33 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> On 2021-02-23 09:24:18 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > Okay, so is it sufficient to add comments in code, or do we want to
> > add something in docs? I am not completely sure if we need to add in
> > docs till we have core-implementation of prepare waiting to get
> > logically replicated.
>
> There's plenty users of logical decoding that aren't going through the
> normal replication mechanism - so they can hit this. So I think it needs
> to be documented somewhere.
>

As per discussion, the attached patch updates both docs and comments
in the code.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-Update-the-docs-and-comments-for-decoding-of-prep.patch application/octet-stream 3.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2021-02-23 06:33:32 Re: Is Recovery actually paused?
Previous Message Robert Treat 2021-02-23 06:18:50 Re: [Doc Patch] Clarify that CREATEROLE roles can GRANT default roles