Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Markus Wanner <markus(dot)wanner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep
Date: 2021-02-23 04:03:15
Message-ID: 20210223040315.hbn7ly2ijjtoyqse@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

On 2021-02-23 09:24:18 +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Okay, so is it sufficient to add comments in code, or do we want to
> add something in docs? I am not completely sure if we need to add in
> docs till we have core-implementation of prepare waiting to get
> logically replicated.

There's plenty users of logical decoding that aren't going through the
normal replication mechanism - so they can hit this. So I think it needs
to be documented somewhere.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Fan 2021-02-23 04:07:37 pg_temp_%d namespace creation can invalidate all the cached plan in other backends
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2021-02-23 03:54:18 Re: locking [user] catalog tables vs 2pc vs logical rep