Re: backup manifests

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Suraj Kharage <suraj(dot)kharage(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tels <nospam-pg-abuse(at)bloodgate(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: backup manifests
Date: 2020-03-30 06:24:33
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LiEwGtO7sq+6XeXGKTKgQi24uGqACfi5CQbj0nOYZ+gw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:28 AM Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 08:42:35PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> > But it feels clear that the name pg_validatebackup is not going
> > over very well with anyone. I think I should rename it to
> > pg_validatemanifest.
>
> Between those two, I would use "pg_validatebackup" if there's a fair chance it
> will end up doing the pg_waldump check. Otherwise, I would use
> "pg_validatemanifest".
>

+1.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-03-30 06:30:58 Re: pgbench - add \aset to store results of a combined query
Previous Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2020-03-30 06:22:32 Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3?