| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Zheng Li <zhengli10(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, rajesh singarapu <rajesh(dot)rs0541(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hou, Zhijie/侯 志杰 <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
| Date: | 2022-05-10 12:39:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1Li15CyyH=hJhQbSdpaeA5yyt4WCU8S0SWiGxctLyefLg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 4:59 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 11:24 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > As we have hacked CreatePublication function for this POC, the
> > regression tests are not passing but we can easily change it so that
> > we invoke new functionality with the syntax proposed in this thread or
> > with some other syntax and we shall do that in the next patch unless
> > this approach is not worth pursuing.
> >
> > This POC is prepared by Ajin Cherian, Hou-San, and me.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150215044814.GL3391%40alvh.no-ip.org
>
> I have updated Amit's patch by including a public action "create" when
> creating publication which is turned off by default.
> Now the 'make check' tests pass. I also fixed a problem that failed to
> create tables when the table has a primary key.
>
Are these the correct set of patches? I don't see a DDL support patch.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ajin Cherian | 2022-05-10 15:17:27 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
| Previous Message | Ajin Cherian | 2022-05-10 11:33:49 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Sharma | 2022-05-10 12:45:55 | How about renaming XLogFileRead() to XLogFileOpenForRead() and XLogFileOpen() to XLogFileOpenForWrite()? |
| Previous Message | Bernd Helmle | 2022-05-10 12:29:31 | Re: Allowing REINDEX to have an optional name |