| From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: server crashed with TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(!parallel_aware || pathnode->path.parallel_safe)" |
| Date: | 2018-06-21 13:23:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAA4eK1LhjMsqkkgFKvQYdFn0gbCUZaEh5ypm0ndRsz=rQkBWgg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 20 June 2018 at 14:28, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> Did you get a chance to look at it?
>>
>> Not yet, but I have planned to do this by tomorrow.
>
>
> After list_concat, the subpaths no longer has only non-partial paths,
> which it is supposed to have. So it anyways should not be used in the
> subsequent code in that function. So I think the following change
> should be good.
> - foreach(l, subpaths)
> + foreach(l, pathnode->subpaths)
>
> Attached patch contains the above change.
>
Thanks, Tom, would you like to go-ahead and commit this change as this
is suggested by you or would you like me to take care of this or do
you want to wait for Robert's input?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-06-21 13:47:18 | Re: partition table and stddev() /variance() behaviour |
| Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2018-06-21 12:56:10 | Re: Postgres 11 release notes |